The tough factor about naming the yr’s greatest losers in tech is that in 2024, it as soon as once more felt like everybody misplaced. Amid the depressing spiral that is social media, the will-they-or-won’t-they dance of banning TikTok within the US and the neverending edited and deepfaked content that has everybody questioning what’s actual, the world misplaced. And it is misplaced.
However a number of areas this yr stood out as significantly troubling. Particularly, AI and devoted AI devices proliferated greater than ever, spreading not solely to our digital assistants and search engines like google however to our wearables as properly. We additionally noticed extra deterioration in Intel’s standing and bid farewell to a robotic maker, in addition to Lightning cables. I’m fairly comfortable about that final one, although.
Our annual assortment of the worst tech developments annually is shorter than regular, however that is perhaps as a result of we’re all exhausted. And in addition as a result of a lot of the dangerous issues may be attributed to AI, social media or misinformation. Nonetheless, we journey down this nightmarish reminiscence lane, hopefully so we will keep away from related pitfalls in future.
Generative AI in each attainable crevice
2024 was a yr wherein consumer-facing AI instruments grew to become tougher and tougher to disregard. That is because of the tech giants Google, Meta and at last Apple baking AI instruments into a few of the most-used software program on the planet. And on this push to get AI in entrance of everybody, I can’t assist however cease and marvel who precisely is asking for this, and is anybody truly utilizing it?
Previously few months, I have been testing a Samsung Chromebook with a host of AI tools built-in in addition to making an attempt the assorted Apple Intelligence options which have rolled out via the autumn. All of it got here to a head in certainly one of Engadget’s Slack channels in early December, just after Apple launched its generative emoji and Image Playground features. Getting Picture Playground to spit out AI-created photos was straightforward sufficient, and Genmoji does really feel just like the logical subsequent step after Apple launched its personalised Memoji again in 2018. However throughout the board, the outcomes felt uninspired, off-putting and -— maybe worst of all -— extraordinarily lame.
Since I take so many photos on my iPhone, there are tons of photographs categorized underneath my identify within the Pictures app (it should group collectively related faces for years, when you let it). With a whole bunch of photographs to select from, Picture Playground shouldn’t have any downside making a convincing facsimile of me… taking part in the guitar on the moon, proper? Properly, sure and no.
On this picture, in addition to ones created of my colleagues Cherlynn Low, Valentina Palladino and Sam Rutherford, there are a number of facial traits that made me really feel that the AI-generated cartoon I used to be taking a look at was on the very least impressed by these individuals. However all of them gave off critical uncanny valley vibes; quite than being a cute digital cartoon like all of us constructed with Bitmoji again within the day, these outcomes are soulless representations with no appeal and mangled fingers.
In a very totally different vein, I simply had event to check out Google’s “assist me learn” summarization options on a 250-page authorities report. I knew I didn’t have time to learn the complete doc and was simply curious what AI might do for me right here. Seems, not a lot. The abstract was so temporary that it was basically meaningless — not unreasonable, because it tried to parse 250 pages into about 100 phrases. I attempted this trick on a overview I used to be writing lately, and it did a significantly better job of capturing the gist of the article, and it additionally precisely answered follow-up questions. However on condition that the ultimate product amounted to perhaps 4 pages, my impression is that AI does a good job of summarizing issues that most individuals can most likely learn themselves within the span of 5 minutes. When you’ve got one thing extra advanced, overlook it.
I might go on — I have been having a blast laughing on the ridiculous notification summaries I get from Apple Intelligence with my co-workers — however I believe I’ve made my level. We’re in the midst of an AI arms race, the place huge corporations are determined to get out forward of the curve with these merchandise properly earlier than they’re prepared for primetime and even all that helpful. And to what finish? I do not assume any AI firm is meaningfully answering a client want or discovering a approach to make individuals’s lives higher or simpler. They’re releasing these items as a result of AI is the buzzword of the last decade, and to disregard it’s to disappoint shareholders. — Nathan Ingraham, deputy editor
Humane AI Pin and different AI devices
This yr, no two gadgets arrived with extra manufactured hype than the Humane AI Pin and Rabbit R1. And no two gadgets had been extra disappointing both. Each Humane and Rabbit made the argument that individuals had been able to drop their telephones for one thing smarter and extra private, however neither of their gadgets had been truly good or helpful.
Of the 2, Humane was simply the largest loser of 2024. The corporate achieved the ignominious honor of reaching internet damaging gross sales as a result of former consumers began returning the AI Pin sooner than new models could possibly be bought. I want I might say its troubles stopped there, however they didn’t. After Humane first warned clients that the AI Pin’s charging case was a fire risk, it issued a formal recall in October. Within the intervening months, the corporate has reportedly tried to find a buyer with out success.
Rabbit has definitely confronted its personal share of troubles, too. After being roundly panned by reviewers in Could, a hacker group announced in June that the R1 had large safety holes. In July, it got here to gentle that person chats with the R1 had been logged with no possibility for deleting.
Final I checked, Humane has since pivoted to making an operating system that it expects different corporations will need to add to their gadgets, however right here’s the factor: poor software program was a giant a part of what made the AI Pin dangerous within the first place. You need to give the corporate factors for making an attempt, however at this level, I’d be stunned if Humane remains to be in enterprise by this time subsequent yr. — Igor Bonifacic, senior reporter
Google Search and AI Overviews
This remark has been making the rounds all yr lengthy, however when you examine Google from 10 years in the past to what it’s now, the distinction is stark. With the introduction of AI Overviews this yr, it felt like Google lastly made search outcomes completely inconceivable to make use of with out scrolling. Neglect sponsored outcomes, newsboxes and discovery panels and all of the totally different modules taking on the highest half of the outcomes web page for any given question — in 2024, Google determined so as to add one more part above every part, pushing the precise listing of internet sites even additional down.
Since its initial release in the US in March, AI Overviews advised individuals it was okay to put glue on pizzas or to eat rocks. Despite the overall tendency for AI to get information unsuitable, Google continued to broaden the characteristic to extra nations, whereas admitting that the overviews could possibly be “odd, inaccurate or unhelpful.”
Not solely that, it additionally started to add ads to Overviews, that means that along with the unreliable AI-generated outcomes on the high, individuals might pay to place what they need to promote in that valuable actual property, too. Throw in the truth that the precise outcomes packing containers and rankings are all vulnerable to search engine optimization gaming by web sites making an attempt every part they’ll to garner a better spot on the listing, and you will find that Google’s search outcomes are principally pay-for-play at this level. And whereas that may proceed to earn the corporate billions of {dollars}, it makes discovering truly good, high-quality outcomes way more arduous for the discerning person.
It will get worse when you think about the precedence Google’s search engine has on iPhones and Android gadgets. This yr, the US authorities declared Google a search monopoly, saying the corporate paid the likes of Apple, Samsung and Mozilla billions of {dollars} a yr to be the default search engine on their gadgets and browsers. Then there’s Chrome, which is the world’s hottest browser with its personal dubious history around tracking users in Incognito mode. Can we even belief what we see on Google Search any extra?
Individuals have begun to give up utilizing Google Search altogether, with the rise of alternate options like DuckDuckGo and Kagi, a search engine you’d pay $10 a month to use, in addition to OpenAI’s SearchGPT, which launched this yr. However I am not satisfied that the overwhelming majority of customers will change to those choices, particularly since certainly one of them prices cash and one other includes extra AI. I can perceive that it is laborious to make a product that adapts to your customers’ wants whereas additionally preserving your shareholders comfortable. If solely Google (or any massive firm, actually) might re-rank its priorities and convey again a search engine that merely connects individuals to one of the best that the web has to supply. — Cherlynn Low, deputy editor
Intel
The highway to each nice tragedy is paved with individuals making probably the most self-serving choices on the worst attainable instances. Which brings us neatly to Intel because it burns via its final remaining probabilities to keep away from changing into a enterprise faculty case research in failure.
Earlier this month, it fired CEO Pat Gelsinger midway via his formidable plan to avoid wasting the chip large from its personal worst instincts. Gelsinger was an engineer, introduced in to repair a tradition too beholdened to finance sorts who can’t see past the subsequent quarter.
Sadly, regardless of telling everybody that fixing twenty years’ value of company fuck-ups would take some time and price cash, it got here as a shock to Intel’s board. It ditched Gelsinger, probably as a result of he was making an attempt to take a longer-term view on easy methods to restore the storied producer’s success.
It’s probably the accursed MBA-types will now get their method, flogging off the corporate’s foundry arm, kneecapping its design group within the course of. It’ll take Intel a decade or extra to truly really feel the implications of ignoring Gelsinger’s Cassandra-like warnings. However when TSMC reigns alone and we’re all paying extra for chips, it’ll be straightforward to level to this second and say this was Intel’s final probability to steer out of its personal skid. — Daniel Cooper, senior editor
Followers of Apple’s Lightning connectors
We knew the writing was on the wall when the iPhone 15 debuted with USB-C in 2023, however this yr put Lightning’s shambling corpse within the grave. The Apple-only connector was a revelation when it debuted in 2012’s iPhone 5, changing the big iPod-era 30-pin connector. Not like the then-ascendant micro-USB port that dominated Android telephones and different small gadgets within the early 2010s, Lightning was thinner and — this was key — reversible, so there was no unsuitable approach to plug it in.
It will definitely made its approach to a big swath of gadgets within the Apple universe, together with AirPods, iPads, Mac equipment and even a Beats product or two. However even Apple relented and began flipping new merchandise to the equally sized (and likewise reversible) USB-C, albeit years after it had develop into the dominant normal for knowledge and energy connections worldwide. With even holdouts just like the AirPods Max and the Mac enter gadgets getting USB-C retrofits in 2024, solely a handful of legacy Lightning gadgets — the iPhone SE, iPhone 14 and outdated Apple Pencil — are left on Apple’s digital cabinets, and all will probably be passed by this time subsequent yr. That’s OK: Lightning served us properly, however its time has handed. All hail our common Sort-C overlords.
So whereas the dying of Lightning is a flat-out win for cross-device charging for the entire world going ahead, anybody whose residence remains to be bristling with soon-to-be-replaced Lightning charging stations may be forgiven for feeling a pang of nostalgia within the meantime. — John Falcone, govt editor
Moxie the robotic dies
After I wrote about Moxie, the child-friendly robotic from Embodied, I used to be charmed by its lovely design and chatty demeanor. It was meant to function a companion to kids, one thing that would assist them learn or just have conversations. I used to be much less charmed by its $1,499 to $1,699 worth, alongside an eventual $60 a month subscription. And now Moxie is formally useless, as Embodied introduced it’s shutting down operations as a result of “monetary challenges” after a failed funding spherical.
Useless residence robots aren’t precisely a brand new phenomenon (remember Jibo?), however Moxie’s demise feels significantly tough, because it was a tool primarily meant to assist youngsters. Think about having to inform your youngster that their robotic good friend needed to shut down due to “monetary challenges.” Embodied stated it might supply clients age acceptable steering to assist talk about the shutdown, however irrespective of the way you spin it, it’ll be a tricky (and probably traumatizing) dialog to your youngin. Maybe it’s good to be taught early although that all of your smart devices will die. (Not our pets although, they’re immortal.) — Devindra Hardawar, senior editor
About The Author
