Palantir co-founder and CEO Alexander Karp opens his new ebook with a provocative declaration: “Silicon Valley has misplaced its manner.”
Over the previous decade or so, as the info analytics firm rose to prominence with its work for U.S. army and intelligence, Karp has largely stayed out of the limelight. Final 12 months, in a rare interview with The New York Times, he described himself as “progressive however not woke,” with “a constantly pro-Western view.”
Now, in “The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West” (co-authored with Nicholas Zamiska, Palantir’s head of company affairs and authorized counsel to the CEO), Karp has written one thing of a manifesto. The truth is, he and Zamiska describe it as “the beginnings of the articulation of the idea” behind Palantir.
Of their telling, Silicon Valley’s early success was created by an in depth alliance between know-how corporations and the U.S. authorities. They argue that this alliance has splintered, with the federal government “ceding the problem of growing the subsequent wave of pathbreaking applied sciences to the non-public sector,” whereas Silicon Valley has “turned inward, focusing its power on slim shopper merchandise, moderately than tasks that talk to and tackle our larger safety and welfare.”
The pair criticize Silicon Valley’s output as dominated by “internet advertising and buying, in addition to social media and video-sharing platforms,” suggesting that that is the results of an business that valorizes constructing issues with out asking what’s price constructing or why.
“The central argument that we advance within the pages that observe is that the software program business ought to rebuild its relationship with authorities and redirect its effort and a focus to establishing the know-how and synthetic intelligence capabilities that may tackle probably the most urgent challenges that we collectively face,” Karp and Zamiska write.
In addition they argue that Silicon Valley’s “engineering elite” has “an affirmative obligation to take part within the protection of the nation and the articulation of a nationwide challenge — what is that this nation, what are our values, and for what can we stand.”
Reviewers haven’t been completely received over. In Bloomberg, John Ganz complained that “The Technological Republic” is “not a ebook in any respect, however a bit of company gross sales materials.”
And in The New Yorker, Gideon Lewis-Kraus suggested that the ebook is an “anachronism,” presumably written earlier than Donald Trump’s victory within the November 2024 election. Now, Lewis-Kraus wrote, “its imaginative and prescient of a mutually supportive relationship between Washington and Silicon Valley has within the interim been rendered virtually quaint.”
Certainly, one factor that Karp and Zamiska criticize is “the reluctance of many enterprise leaders to enterprise into, in any significant manner and other than the occasional and theatrical foray, probably the most consequential social and cultural debates of our time.”
After all, we are actually seeing at the least one enterprise chief take this directive to become involved in politics fairly significantly, as Trump ally Elon Musk attempts to remake the federal government by way of his Division of Authorities Effectivity.
About The Author
