On Monday, Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, offered to purchase the nonprofit that successfully governs OpenAI for $97.4 billion. The unsolicited buyout could be financed by Musk’s AI firm, xAI, and a consortium of outside investors, per a letter despatched to California and Delaware’s attorneys normal.
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman quickly dismissed Musk’s bid, and took it as an opportunity to publicly dunk on him.
“no thanks, however we are going to purchase Twitter for $9.74 billion if you’d like,” Altman wrote in a post on X simply hours after studies emerged of Musk’s supply for OpenAI. Musk owns X, the social community previously generally known as Twitter; he paid roughly $44 billion for it in October 2022.
The 2 have a historical past. Musk is an OpenAI co-founder, and each he and xAI are at present concerned in a lawsuit that alleges that OpenAI engaged in anticompetitive habits, amongst different issues.
However Altman’s rejection of a $97.4 billion takeover supply is extra sophisticated than simply saying “no thanks,” based on company governance specialists who spoke with TechCrunch.
Stalling OpenAI’s nonprofit conversion
For background, OpenAI was based as a nonprofit earlier than transitioning to a “capped-profit” construction in 2019. The nonprofit is the only controlling shareholder of the capped-profit OpenAI company, which retains formal fiduciary duty to the nonprofit’s constitution.
OpenAI is now within the technique of restructuring — this time to a conventional for-profit firm, particularly a public profit company — in a bid to lift rather more capital. However Musk — who’s notorious for drowning his enemies in legal troubles — might have stalled the transition and raised the worth of OpenAI’s nonprofit along with his bid.
Delaware and California‘s attorneys normal have requested extra info from the ChatGPT maker about its plans to transform to a for-profit profit company. The state of affairs additionally forces it to think about exterior bids critically.
OpenAI’s board will almost certainly refuse the bid, however Musk has been setting the stage for future authorized and regulatory battles. He’s already making an attempt to stall OpenAI’s for-profit conversion via an injunction, as an illustration. The bid seems to be another supply, of types.
Now, OpenAI’s board should reveal that it’s not underselling OpenAI’s nonprofit by handing the nonprofit’s property, together with IP from OpenAI’s proprietary analysis, to an insider (e.g. Sam Altman) for a steep low cost.
“Musk is throwing a spanner into the works,” mentioned Stephen Diamond, a lawyer who represented Musk’s opponents in company governance battles at Tesla, in an interview with TechCrunch. “He’s exploiting the fiduciary obligation of the nonprofit board to not undersell the asset. [Musk’s bid] is one thing OpenAI has to concentrate to.”
OpenAI is alleged to be gearing up for a funding spherical that may value its for-profit arm at $260 billion. The Info studies that OpenAI’s nonprofit is slated to get a 25% stake in OpenAI’s for-profit.
Along with his bid, Musk has signaled there’s a minimum of one group of investors keen to pay a large premium for OpenAI’s nonprofit wing. That places the board of administrators in a good spot.
Grounds for rejection
Nonetheless, simply because Musk threw out an eye-popping supply doesn’t imply that OpenAI’s nonprofit has to just accept.
Company regulation offers super authority to incumbent boards to guard in opposition to unsolicited takeover bids, based on David Yosifon, a Santa Clara College professor of company governance regulation.
OpenAI might make the case that Musk’s bid is a hostile takeover try on condition that Musk and Altman aren’t the best of friends.
The corporate might additionally argue that Musk’s supply isn’t credible as a result of OpenAI is already within the midst of a company restructuring course of.
One other method OpenAI might take could be difficult Musk on whether or not he has the funds. As The New York Times notes, Musk’s wealth is basically tied to his Tesla inventory, that means that Musk’s investment partners must provide a lot of the $97.4 billion whole.
OpenAI’s board might must overview Musk’s supply to totally asses whether or not it aligns with the nonprofit’s mission, not simply particular monetary or strategic objectives, based on Scott Curran, the previous normal counsel to the Clinton Basis. Which means Musk’s supply could possibly be weighed in opposition to OpenAI’s mission: “to make sure that synthetic normal intelligence – AI techniques which might be usually smarter than people – advantages all of humanity.”
“When Altman posted that response [on X], that was most likely accomplished with out authorized steering,” Yosifon mentioned. “It’s not good for a regulator to see that sort of dismissive, knee-jerk tweet.”
Elevating the worth for OpenAI property
The board is more likely to aspect with Altman. Almost all the administrators joined after Altman was briefly fired, then rehired, by the nonprofit’s board in late 2023. Altman himself can be a board member.
If nothing else, Musk’s bid might increase the potential market worth of the OpenAI nonprofit’s property. That might drive OpenAI to lift extra capital than it initially anticipated, and complicate talks with the startup’s present backers. It might additionally dilute the worth of stakes held by OpenAI buyers within the for-profit arm, together with main companions reminiscent of Microsoft.
That’s certain to anger Altman, who’s been working with buyers for months to find out tips on how to pretty compensate the nonprofit.
The gist is: OpenAI’s company restructuring plans simply obtained extra advanced.
TechCrunch has an AI-focused publication! Sign up here to get it in your inbox each Wednesday.
About The Author
