Rumman Chowdhury, an information scientist, nonprofit founder, and former director of Twitter’s machine ethics workforce, had robust phrases for Elon Musk and the Division of Authorities Effectivity (DOGE) during an SXSW panel on Thursday.
“When your funding is frozen and also you don’t know in case you’re gonna be fired, and there’s this, like, completely unhinged individual saying bizarre issues on the web continually, you continue to must do your job, proper?” Chowdhury mentioned. “The lights must be saved on as a result of Elon Musk isn’t the one protecting the lights on, although he would love you to suppose that.”
Musk and DOGE, which Musk is advising, have rushed to chop employees throughout U.S. federal businesses, in some instances in ways in which compromise cybersecurity. The initiative has gutted the Client Monetary Safety Bureau, diminished headcount on the Nationwide Freeway Site visitors Security Administration, and fired probationary workers on the Federal Aviation Administration, amongst others.
Chowdhury fears the mind drain ensuing from the dramatic reductions and chaotic administration type. She says she noticed the same development at Twitter again in 2022, when Musk acquired the platform for $43 billion. Chowdhury was one in all many employees let go at brief discover after Musk’s takeover.
“So some estimates say about 20% of [Twitter] had already left earlier than [Musk] even took over, after which he fired one other 30% on prime of that, proper?” Chowdhury mentioned. “So we’re speaking an enormous chunk of the corporate being simply gone, whether or not of their very own volition or not, however I feel a very powerful factor was that simply the looming shadow of [Musk’s] existence utterly killed the tradition of Twitter.”
Chowdhury added, “[I]t’s scary to see that occuring to the U.S. authorities, an establishment that issues considerably in each American’s life and even to individuals past American borders. Twitter was an organization, sure — it was an impactful firm, however it’s not the identical as a authorities. […] [Musk] breeds chaotic environments, and chaos isn’t the place good work occurs.”
Chowdhury additionally took concern with Musk’s imaginative and prescient for Twitter — now X — which she mentioned ties in along with his strategy to politics. She accused Musk of utilizing X as a propoganda software for his personal ideology — a “megaphone” to push his perspective to the world.
“Like, I don’t suppose there’s any debate or dialogue available right here,” Chowdhury mentioned. “I don’t suppose [former Twitter CEO] Jack Dorsey acted anyplace close to the best way Elon Musk [has] — he was not on Twitter daily along with his opinions, blocking individuals, you already know, amplifying others, calling some individuals terrorists — like, Jack didn’t act that means.”
One report found that Musk shared deceptive claims in regards to the 2024 U.S. presidential election that had been seen almost 1.2 billion occasions on X. In posts this 12 months, Musk has repeatedly made false assertions about federal spending, Ukrainian aggression, and the role of offices just like the Federal Emergency Administration Company.
Musk has gone so far as to question X’s personal fact-checking system, Neighborhood Notes, after it corrected posts on X that claimed Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the nation’s elected president, had low approval scores amongst its residents. “Sadly, Neighborhood Notes is more and more being gamed by governments and legacy media,” Musk claimed without evidence in a post.
About The Author
